Steamboats.org Homepage  
  not logged in.
           forgot password?

D.Q., M.Q. Boilers

 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 05-14-2010, 09:18 AM
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 130
Default D.Q., M.Q. Boilers

I'm far from a expert on boilers and a good deal of this is what I have heard others, with much more background, talk about.
The boilers in both boats are very dated compared to what is available on the market today.
The fuel used by both is #6, or black oil. It was at one time almost a waste product and inexpensive. Today due to lack of demand, it is very costly and hard to find pratical refueling places.
Even converting either boat to Diesel Fuel would not be cost effective due to the poor preformance inhairent of either set of boilers.
Older style boilers were put together on site where as todays boilers are of the "Package" type and placed on location as all one unit.
Anyone who was truly intrested in operating the D.Q. again would be $$$$ ahead by replacing the current boilers with modern, higher efficency, #2 fueled boilers.
Chief Fred Rich reserached this during the '08 season and came up with figures that would have the boilers paying for themselves within 5 years.
The maintenance on the newer boilers is also much less that what the current boilers require.
The U.S.C.G. would also look much more favorable on the newer boilers.
Most passengers could care less about where the steam comes from and those that do would most likely applaude the mating of modern tech. with keeping the older boat alive.
While the D.Q. boilers might have some historical value, the scrap yards are full of M.Q. style boilers.
This is just my opinion but the M.Q. boilers were a poor choice from the begining and attempting to repower the D.Q. with them would also be a poor choice.
As much as I hate it, bring the D.Q. out will be about $$$$. It is my hope that if she is ever to return to river service, whoever does it will be willing to avoid the pitfalls of the past. Spend the $$$$ up front to bring her back to service and realize that any mechanical system requires a certain amount of upkeep and cost to operated at peak efficenty.
Much like a certain oil filter commerical, "Pay me now, or Pay me later". The up front $$$$ is cheaper in the long run.
Reply With Quote
 

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are Off
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Looking for photos of Western River Steamboat Boilers from 1800's Mike Bara Steamboats & History 6 09-02-2008 11:25 PM
DQ's boilers pass inspection Jim Reising River Talk & Cruises 1 03-09-2007 10:07 AM
JACOB STRADERS's boilers/Arranged fore and aft. R. Dale Flick Steamboats & History 10 02-27-2007 03:56 PM
Boilers Hank Bloomer Steamboats & History 27 02-26-2007 12:41 PM
Boilers/DENNY BROS./Michigan news. R. Dale Flick Steamboats & History 0 07-24-2006 11:13 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:08 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
All content on this site is copyright protected and may not be re-used without written permission.
Bookmark and Share